Hi Linus
Gently Ping...
Any feedback about the proposal?
Regards
Dong Aisheng
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Dong Aisheng <dongas86@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Bai Ping <ping.bai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Add pinctrl binding doc update for imx6sll.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bai Ping <ping.bai@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> I have to push back on this a bit.
>>
>>> +Please refer to fsl,imx-pinctrl.txt in this directory for common binding part
>>> +and usage.
>>
>> I understand that it is building on top of the old i.MX bindings and that
>> it has some kind of "tradition" coming with it.
>>
>> At the same time, the i.MX bindings came about before we had the
>> generic pin control bindings defined.
>>
>>> +CONFIG bits definition:
>>> +PAD_CTL_LVE (1 << 22)
>>> +PAD_CTL_HYS (1 << 16)
>>> +PAD_CTL_PUS_100K_DOWN (0 << 14)
>>> +PAD_CTL_PUS_47K_UP (1 << 14)
>>> +PAD_CTL_PUS_100K_UP (2 << 14)
>>> +PAD_CTL_PUS_22K_UP (3 << 14)
>>> +PAD_CTL_PUE (1 << 13)
>>> +PAD_CTL_PKE (1 << 12)
>>> +PAD_CTL_ODE (1 << 11)
>>> +PAD_CTL_SPEED_LOW (0 << 6)
>>> +PAD_CTL_SPEED_MED (1 << 6)
>>> +PAD_CTL_SPEED_HIGH (3 << 6)
>>> +PAD_CTL_DSE_DISABLE (0 << 3)
>>> +PAD_CTL_DSE_260ohm (1 << 3)
>>> +PAD_CTL_DSE_130ohm (2 << 3)
>>> +PAD_CTL_DSE_87ohm (3 << 3)
>>> +PAD_CTL_DSE_65ohm (4 << 3)
>>> +PAD_CTL_DSE_52ohm (5 << 3)
>>> +PAD_CTL_DSE_43ohm (6 << 3)
>>> +PAD_CTL_DSE_37ohm (7 << 3)
>>> +PAD_CTL_SRE_FAST (1 << 0)
>>> +PAD_CTL_SRE_SLOW (0 << 0)
>>
>> A whole slew of these if not all correspond to the generic bindings.
>>
>> I would consider augmenting the code in the driver to handle the generic
>> bindings *in addition* to the old legacy bindings, and use those over these
>> random custom bits.
>>
>> Read drivers using CONFIG_GENERIC_PINCONF as an inspiration.
>>
>> For example see commit
>> cefbf1a1b29531a970bc2908a50a75d6474fcc38
>> "pinctrl: sunxi: Support generic binding"
>> from Maxime Ripard, where he does a similar thing for sunxi.
>>
>
> First thanks for your good suggestion!
>
> All we realized that the raw data of IMX pad config in dts is not good.
> e.g.
> pinctrl_ecspi3: ecspi3grp {
> fsl,pins = <
> MX7D_PAD_SAI2_TX_SYNC__ECSPI3_MISO 0x17059
> .........
>
> I did a deep feasibility analysis these days on the migrating to generic
> pinctrl binding you referred. It is regrettably that it may not be so suitable
> for IMX to fully migrate right now.
>
> Generic binding only supports parsing strings for pins and function
> from dts right now, that means we need back to the old way of hardcoding
> all register bits in driver which we actually chose to move out since
> the commit "e164153 pinctrl: imx: move hard-coding data into device tree".
>
> And IMX doesn't have PAD GROUP in HW, each pad theoretically can be muxed
> as 8 single functions.
> e.g.
> For IOMUXC_SW_MUX_CTL_PAD_CSI_DATA07
> MUX_MODE MUX Mode Select Field.
> Select 1 of 8 iomux modes to be used for pad: CSI_DATA07.
> 000 ALT0 — Select signal CSI1_DATA09.
> 001 ALT1 — Select signal ESAI_TX3_RX2.
> 010 ALT2 — Select signal I2C4_SDA.
> 011 ALT3 — Select signal KPP_ROW7.
> 100 ALT4 — Select signal UART6_CTS_B.
> 101 ALT5 — Select signal GPIO1_IO21.
> 110 ALT6 — Select signal EIM_DATA16.
> 111 ALT7 — Select signal DCIC1_OUT.
> By converting to generic binding, we need construct a huge function/group map
> in driver for hundreds of pads for each SoC. That is a bit fear to us.
>
> Current IMX method only generates the used function/groups dynamically
> by parsing board dts which is much a lighter way.
>
> But of course, we want to fix the raw config value issue as well which is
> un-maintainable and un-readable as you pointed out.
>
> I think there might be two options for us to go:
> One option is using macro definitions instead of raw data as pinctrl-single
> users as OMAP.
> e.g.
> art2_pins: pinmux_uart2_pins {
> pinctrl-single,pins = <
> OMAP4_IOPAD(0x118, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0)
> /* uart2_cts.uart2_cts */
> ........
>
> For this way, no driver changes required, just replace the raw data by macro
> in device tree. But i wonder this may not be your original intention although
> it's the easiest way for us.
> Anyway, if you agree, we probably would prefer this way.
>
> Another option is partially convert to generic binding for only pad
> configuration
> part. e.g.
> pinctrl_usdhc1: usdhc1grp {
> fsl,pins = <
> MX7D_PAD_SD1_CMD__SD1_CMD
> MX7D_PAD_SD1_CLK__SD1_CLK
> MX7D_PAD_SD1_DATA0__SD1_DATA0
> ...
> >;
> bias-pull-up = <47KOHM>;
> drive-strength = <130OHM>;
> slew-rate = <FAST>;
> speed = <50MHZ>;
> ....
> };
> (Some of the property still not supported or not the same as generic
> binding right now)
>
> This way requires no big drivers changes and only extend the driver
> to support the generic pinctrl dt configuration properties.
>
> And it also fix the raw data issues and looks like more applicable than the full
> migration.
>
> So would you be willing to accept it?
>
> Another potential benefits for this way is that we may can use PCONFDUMP
> to dump a more readable data from pinctrl debug system.
>
>> Yours,
>> Linus Walleij
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> Regards
> Dong Aisheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
