Hi Pavel,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon 2017-02-20 21:33:27, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Nothing in the PSCI specification requires the SoC to remain powered and
>> to support wake-up sources when suspended using SYSTEM_SUSPEND.
>> If the firmware implements the PSCI SYSTEM_SUSPEND operation by cutting
>> power to the SoC, the only possibly wake-up sources are thus the ones
>> connected to the PMIC.
>>
>> Document and add support for an "arm,psci-system-suspend-is-power-down"
>> DT property, so Linux uses a different suspend method when other wake-up
>> sources (e.g. wake on LAN, UART or GPIO) are enabled.
>
> Should we make PSCI return that information? (At least in next
> specification version?)
That's a possible solution.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
