Hi Dmitry, > Am 17.02.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 03:03:07PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi Dmitry, >> >>> Am 12.02.2017 um 16:18 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> Hi Dmitry, >>> >>>> Am 28.01.2017 um 19:16 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>> >>>> Hi Dmitry, >>>> there have been no further comments/complaints about this patch series in the last month. >>>> And it appears as if only your action is needed. >>>> >>>> What is missing for this patch series to be finally accepted? >>> >>> Did you find time to look into my comment on patch 1/9 and make a decision on patch 6/8? >>> >>> Is there anything open which prohibits inclusion to (and further testing within) linux/next? >> >> May I ask a question for my fundamental understanding of the Linux integration process. >> Maybe, I have a wrong expectation which you can clarify. >> >> My question is how it does come that patches like >> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=449aa83e69ff10d77fe088eadacafe1e97937c14 >> >> appear within 2 days in linux-next, but our patch series had months of review (we are at v9) >> and there have been no further comments from the community for weeks? > > Simpler patches are easy to apply, patches that have some contention > tend to get unapplied longer, as they require more consideration. Fine. Now I have better understanding. > >> >> What is still missing what we can do or provide as information? > > I just replied to the other email from you. BR and thanks, Nikolaus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
