On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/17/2017 09:50 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 02/15/2017 03:48 PM, yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> This is an attempt to revive DT support for TI HECC that was started in 2015 [1]. >>>> >>>> Changes v2 -> v3: >>>> - rename compatible property to "ti,am3517-hecc" (though there is a stipped >>>> device named 3505, EMAC driver already uses am3517-emac name, so keep this >>>> property consistent) >>>> - use reg-names to specify different HECC I/O mapping (suggested by Tony Lindgren) >>>> - provide fallback offsets and sizes for board files >>> >>> Are there any board files using te_hecc intree? I don't see any on the >>> first glance. What about making the driver DT only? >> >> Good idea. I aslo wanted to ask this. So this means we could >> completely get rid of include/linux/can/platform/ti_hecc.h? > > If there isn't any in-tree user, thes yes. Btw. what should we do about "@transceiver_switch: platform specific callback fn for transceiver control"? Model it via something like this: enable-gpios = <&gpio6 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* gpio 175 */ Yegor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
