On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 07:08:46PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 08.02.2017, 18:15, "Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:00:06PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> Allwinner A64 SoC has a R_PIO node like the one in H3.
> >>
> >> Add the node as well as needed clocks and resets.
> >>
> >> As there's no document for apb0_gates, I only added the R_PIO bit here.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >> index 1c64ea2d23f9..4b0baa79554c 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >> @@ -98,6 +98,15 @@
> >> clock-output-names = "osc32k";
> >> };
> >>
> >> + apb0: apb0_clk {
> >> + compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
> >> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> + clock-div = <1>;
> >> + clock-mult = <1>;
> >> + clocks = <&osc24M>;
> >> + clock-output-names = "apb0";
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> psci {
> >> compatible = "arm,psci-0.2";
> >> method = "smc";
> >> @@ -392,5 +401,36 @@
> >> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 40 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> >> <GIC_SPI 41 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >> };
> >> +
> >> + apb0_gates: clk@1f01428 {
> >> + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-apb0-gates-clk",
> >> + "allwinner,sun4i-a10-gates-clk";
> >> + reg = <0x01f01428 0x4>;
> >> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> >> + clocks = <&apb0>;
> >> + clock-indices = <0>;
> >> + clock-output-names = "apb0_pio";
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + apb0_rst: reset@1f014b0 {
> >> + reg = <0x01f014b0 0x4>;
> >> + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-clock-reset";
> >> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> >> + };
> >
> > Please make a sunxi-ng driver for those clocks.
>
> We have no enough materials to make such a CCU driver.
>
> Clocks in CPUs are usually undocumented, and difficult to
> be collected -- even the clk-sun50iw1.c in BSP do not have
> all clocks in CPUs.
That's unfortunate, but we can deal with that by simply extending the
clocks we have. Nothing too complicated or unconvenient to deal with.
> We should only make it sunxi-ng until it's fully discovered (all
> functions in CPUs are functional).
No, I expect that by 4.12 we have converted every users to sunxi-ng,
PRCM included.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
