On 08/02/17 23:53, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 3:07:37 AM CET Chris Packham wrote: >>> >>> Actually I wonder if I can try a bit harder to keep a system booting. >>> The following might work >>> 1) add the compatible strings to the existing armada clock drivers. >>> 2) update the dts to use the new compatible strings. >>> 3) add the new driver and remove the compatible strings from the armada >>> drivers. >>> >>> #1 would still upset checkpatch.pl because the documentation would only >>> arrive in #2. >> >> Actually upon testing #1 is unnecessary. I lose some of the gated clocks >> but nothing that prevents booting. > > Just to be sure: this means we can merge 2) and 3) independently and > having just one of them will not cause regressions over what we have > today? > Correct. And that's what I sent out as v2. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-February/486467.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-February/486471.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
