On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> No power supply(ies) for this panel? > > power-supply is mentioned in simple-panel.txt. > >>> +This binding is compatible with the simple-panel binding, which is specified >>> +in simple-panel.txt in this directory. > > and this doc refers to simple-panel.txt. Isn't that enough? Except I have no way of knowing whether: a) you omitted a supply because you don't (yet) care, b) the panel has a single supply and you are using power-supply or c) the panel has multiple supplies and your binding is wrong. I can only eliminate A if you list the supplies. Just need something like "power-supply : see simple-panel.txt". I've still got to go read the panel spec if I really want to check the binding. > Seems like a common pattern for the other simple panel binding doc. We've gotten stricter about this. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
