On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:02:04PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > > static struct ccu_reset_map sunxi_h3_h5_ccu_resets[] = {
> > > [RST_USB_PHY0] = { 0x0cc, BIT(0) },
> > > [RST_USB_PHY1] = { 0x0cc, BIT(1) },
> > > @@ -791,6 +910,7 @@ static struct ccu_reset_map sunxi_h3_h5_ccu_resets[] = {
> > > [RST_BUS_UART2] = { 0x2d8, BIT(18) },
> > > [RST_BUS_UART3] = { 0x2d8, BIT(19) },
> > > [RST_BUS_SCR0] = { 0x2d8, BIT(20) },
> > > + [RST_BUS_SCR1] = { 0x2d8, BIT(21) },
> >
> > That reset line is not valid on the H3.
>
> So I should split a H3 reset array and a H5 one?
Ideally, yes.
> (I modelled after ccu-sun5i.c, which shares one reset array)
They all share the same reset lines.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
