On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:47:29PM -0500, Sebastien Bourdelin wrote:
> This watchdog is instantiated in a FPGA and can only be access using a
> GPIOs bit-banged bus, called the NBUS by Technologic Systems.
> The watchdog is made of only one register, called the feed register.
> Writing to this register will re-arm the watchdog for a given time (and
> enable it if it was disable). It can be disabled by writing a special
> value into it.
> ---
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> - rebase on master
> - retrieve the ts_nbus instantiated by the parent node (suggested by
> Linus Walleij)
> - rename the wdt by watchdog in the device tree and in the
> documentation (suggested by Rob Herring)
> - add a dependency to the TS_NBUS driver in the Kconfig (suggested by
> Guenter Roeck)
> - simplify the set_timeout function (suggested by Guenter Roeck)
> - use the max_hw_heartbeat_ms callback instead of the max_timeout
> callback (suggested by Guenter Roeck)
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastien Bourdelin <sebastien.bourdelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/ts4600-wdt.txt | 16 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-ts4600-common.dtsi | 5 +
> drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 11 ++
> drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/watchdog/ts4600_wdt.c | 217 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 250 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/ts4600-wdt.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/ts4600_wdt.c
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/ts4600-wdt.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/ts4600-wdt.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7de00ceae341
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/ts4600-wdt.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +TS-4600 Technologic Systems Watchdog
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: must be "technologic,ts4600-wdt"
> +- reg: offset to the FPGA's watchdog register
> +
> +Optional property:
> +- timeout-sec: contains the watchdog timeout in seconds.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +watchdog {
> + compatible = "technologic,ts4600-wdt";
> + reg = <0x2a>;
> + timeout-sec = <10>;
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-ts4600-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-ts4600-common.dtsi
> index c6282d5479de..092c2eed0fe7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-ts4600-common.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-ts4600-common.dtsi
> @@ -116,6 +116,11 @@
> ts-strobe-gpios = <&gpio0 25 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> ts-ale-gpios = <&gpio0 26 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> ts-rdy-gpios = <&gpio0 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +
> + watchdog@2a {
> + compatible = "technologic,ts4600-wdt";
> + reg = <0x2a>;
> + };
> };
>
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> index acb00b53a520..ab1355eefad1 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> @@ -500,6 +500,17 @@ config NUC900_WATCHDOG
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> module will be called nuc900_wdt.
>
> +config TS4600_WATCHDOG
> + tristate "TS-4600 Watchdog"
> + depends on TS_NBUS
> + depends on HAS_IOMEM && OF
> + depends on SOC_IMX28 || COMPILE_TEST
> + select WATCHDOG_CORE
> + help
> + Technologic Systems TS-4600 has watchdog timer implemented in
> + an external FPGA. Say Y here if you want to support for the
> + watchdog timer on TS-4600 board.
> +
> config TS4800_WATCHDOG
> tristate "TS-4800 Watchdog"
> depends on HAS_IOMEM && OF
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Makefile b/drivers/watchdog/Makefile
> index 0c3d35e3c334..d5e164d2b4cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Makefile
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RN5T618_WATCHDOG) += rn5t618_wdt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COH901327_WATCHDOG) += coh901327_wdt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_STMP3XXX_RTC_WATCHDOG) += stmp3xxx_rtc_wdt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_NUC900_WATCHDOG) += nuc900_wdt.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TS4600_WATCHDOG) += ts4600_wdt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TS4800_WATCHDOG) += ts4800_wdt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TS72XX_WATCHDOG) += ts72xx_wdt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IMX2_WDT) += imx2_wdt.o
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/ts4600_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/ts4600_wdt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d7bf6cc04986
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/ts4600_wdt.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
> +/*
> + * Watchdog driver for TS-4600 based boards
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2016 - Savoir-faire Linux
> + * Author: Sebastien Bourdelin <sebastien.bourdelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + *
> + * The watchdog on the TS-4600 based boards is in an FPGA and can only be
> + * accessed using a GPIO bit-banged bus called the NBUS by Technologic Systems.
> + * The logic for the watchdog is the same then for the TS-4800 SoM, only the way
> + * to access it change, therefore this driver is heavely based on the ts4800_wdt
> + * driver from Damien Riegel <damien.riegel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/ts-nbus.h>
> +#include <linux/watchdog.h>
> +
> +static bool nowayout = WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT;
> +module_param(nowayout, bool, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(nowayout,
> + "Watchdog cannot be stopped once started (default="
> + __MODULE_STRING(WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT) ")");
> +
> +/* possible feed values */
> +#define TS4600_WDT_FEED_2S 0x1
> +#define TS4600_WDT_FEED_10S 0x2
> +#define TS4600_WDT_DISABLE 0x3
> +
> +struct ts4600_wdt {
> + struct watchdog_device wdd;
> + struct ts_nbus *ts_nbus;
> + u32 feed_offset;
> + u32 feed_val;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * TS-4600 supports the following timeout values:
> + *
> + * value desc
> + * ---------------------
> + * 0 feed for 338ms
> + * 1 feed for 2.706s
> + * 2 feed for 10.824s
> + * 3 disable watchdog
> + *
> + * Keep the regmap/timeout map ordered by timeout
> + */
> +static const struct {
> + const int timeout;
> + const int regval;
> +} ts4600_wdt_map[] = {
> + { 2, TS4600_WDT_FEED_2S },
> + { 10, TS4600_WDT_FEED_10S },
> +};
Does this table really do any good ? Seems to me it might be simpler
to just use raw values where needed.
> +
> +#define MAX_TIMEOUT_INDEX (ARRAY_SIZE(ts4600_wdt_map) - 1)
> +
> +static void ts4600_write_feed(struct ts4600_wdt *wdt, u32 val)
> +{
> + ts_nbus_write(wdt->ts_nbus, wdt->feed_offset, val);
> +}
> +
> +static int ts4600_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> +{
> + struct ts4600_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
> +
> + ts4600_write_feed(wdt, wdt->feed_val);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ts4600_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> +{
> + struct ts4600_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
> +
> + ts4600_write_feed(wdt, TS4600_WDT_DISABLE);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ts4600_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
> + unsigned int timeout)
> +{
> + struct ts4600_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + if (ts4600_wdt_map[i].timeout < timeout)
> + i = MAX_TIMEOUT_INDEX;
> +
> + wdd->timeout = ts4600_wdt_map[i].timeout;
This is not correct. you would only set wdd->timeout to the value from
the table if the timeout is <= the requested timeout. Otherwise,
set the requested timeout value. Otherwise the timeout will be set
to a maximum of 10 seconds, and using the core to support larger
timeouts does not work.
> + wdt->feed_val = ts4600_wdt_map[i].regval;
> +
FWIW, personally I think that
if (timeout <= 2) {
wdd->timeout = 2;
wdt->feed_val = TS4600_WDT_FEED_2S;
} else {
wdd->timeout = timeout < 10 ? 10 : timeout;
wdt->feed_val = TS4600_WDT_FEED_10S;
}
would be simpler than dealing with the table.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct watchdog_ops ts4600_wdt_ops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .start = ts4600_wdt_start,
> + .stop = ts4600_wdt_stop,
> + .set_timeout = ts4600_wdt_set_timeout,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct watchdog_info ts4600_wdt_info = {
> + .options = WDIOF_SETTIMEOUT | WDIOF_MAGICCLOSE | WDIOF_KEEPALIVEPING,
> + .identity = "TS-4600 Watchdog",
> +};
> +
> +static int ts4600_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct ts_nbus *ts_nbus;
> + struct watchdog_device *wdd;
> + struct ts4600_wdt *wdt;
> + u32 reg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", ®);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing reg property\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* allocate memory for watchdog struct */
> + wdt = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*wdt), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!wdt)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* set offset to know where to write */
> + wdt->feed_offset = reg;
> +
> + /* keep a pointer to the ts_nbus instanciated by the parent node */
> + ts_nbus = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
> + if (!ts_nbus) {
> + dev_err(dev, "missing ts-nbus compatible parent node\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(ts_nbus);
> + }
> + wdt->ts_nbus = ts_nbus;
> +
> + /* Initialize struct watchdog_device */
> + wdd = &wdt->wdd;
> + wdd->parent = dev;
> + wdd->info = &ts4600_wdt_info;
> + wdd->ops = &ts4600_wdt_ops;
> + wdd->min_timeout = ts4600_wdt_map[0].timeout;
> + wdd->max_hw_heartbeat_ms =
> + ts4600_wdt_map[MAX_TIMEOUT_INDEX].timeout * 1000;
Why not 10824 ?
> +
> + watchdog_set_drvdata(wdd, wdt);
> + watchdog_set_nowayout(wdd, nowayout);
> + watchdog_init_timeout(wdd, 0, dev);
> +
> + /*
> + * As this watchdog supports only a few values, ts4600_wdt_set_timeout
> + * must be called to initialize timeout and feed_val with valid values.
> + * Default to maximum timeout if none, or an invalid one, is provided in
> + * device tree.
> + */
> + if (!wdd->timeout)
> + wdd->timeout = wdd->max_timeout;
There is no max_timeout anymore. Just initialize timeout with a value
of your choice, such as 30 seconds, before calling watchdog_init_timeout().
> + ts4600_wdt_set_timeout(wdd, wdd->timeout);
> +
> + /*
> + * The feed register is write-only, so it is not possible to determine
> + * watchdog's state. Disable it to be in a known state.
> + */
> + ts4600_wdt_stop(wdd);
> +
> + ret = watchdog_register_device(wdd);
Optimal candidate for devm_wtchdog_register_device(). It lets you drop
the remove function and platform_set_drvdata().
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register watchdog device\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, wdt);
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "initialized (timeout = %d sec, nowayout = %d)\n",
> + wdd->timeout, nowayout);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ts4600_wdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct ts4600_wdt *wdt = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + watchdog_unregister_device(&wdt->wdd);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id ts4600_wdt_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "technologic,ts4600-wdt", },
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ts4600_wdt_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver ts4600_wdt_driver = {
> + .probe = ts4600_wdt_probe,
> + .remove = ts4600_wdt_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "ts4600_wdt",
> + .of_match_table = ts4600_wdt_of_match,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(ts4600_wdt_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sebastien Bourdelin <sebastien.bourdelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:ts4600_wdt");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
