On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 10:46 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > +dtc list > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I recently updated the device-tree-compiler package on the system > which > > builds the split device tree repo[0] from 1.4.0+dfsg-2 to 1.4.2-1 > > (debian package versions) and now during the test build I see many > > (over 1,000) of these: > > > > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc@ff700000/ethernet@b000 > 0 has a unit name, but no reg property > > > > Is this something which is known? Maybe Linux hasn't pulled in the > > newer dtc yet so you aren't hitting it yet, or maybe you've done > what I > > did as a quick fix and added: > > DTC_FLAGS="-W no-unit_address_vs_reg" > > ? > > Linux has this, but the warnings are only enabled with "W=1" builds. > I'm trying to not have to review the trivial crap. Specifically Linux adds the DTC_FLAGS="-W no-unit_address_vs_reg" only if W=0 (rather than enabling it if W=1). I'll disable that one in the split tree too then. > It's going to spew even more soon. I've posted some more dtc checks > last week. Fun! > > (a second issue is the lack of the offending filename in the > > warning message, I'll figure out the right venue for that next) > > Yeah, I don't think the dtc checks infrastructure has the information > as they run on the live tree after all the parsing is done. I also started a thread on -compiler. I've replied there already (to whit: printing the output filename in the warning would be a useful improvement). Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
