> 30 янв. 2017 г., в 16:12, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> написал(а): > > I don't get the point of these changes. The patch does not explain why they are > needed. I’d like to extract timer API from current implementation. And to make code more readable I’d like to introduce 'struct rk_timer’ what can be reused with current implementation and with my patch (8/8). And in order keep patches simple and readable I split that into three patches: 5/8, 6/8, 7/8. Current implementation named rockchip timer as ‘struct bc_timer’ (broadcast timer). I renamed it to more suitable to it role (may be bad choice). Yes, the patch itself looks strange. You are right. What do you think about that solution: - in the patch 6/8 i will Introduce 'struct rk_timer’ and 'struct rk_time_clkevt’ (renamed ‘struct bc_timer’). - rk_timer_init() changes from 5/8 I will merge with 8/8 - 8/8 introduce 'struct rk_time_clksrc' - 5/8 drop Alexander. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
