On 29/01/17 22:51, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:30:01PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:56:13PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> The joys of copy/paste: the example of a virtualization capable GIC >>> in the DT binding was wrong, and propagated to dozens of platforms. >>> By having a GICC region that is only 4kB (instead of 8kB), we >>> end-up not being able to access the GICC_DIR register which is on >>> the second page. >>> >>> Oh well. Let's fix the source of the crap before tackling individual >>> offenders. While we're at it, also fix the compatibility string to >>> mention "arm,gic-400", which is the name of the actual implementation >>> of the GICv2 spec. >> >> "While we're at it", code for should be in a separate patch. :) I >> wouldn't really care here, but you are not fixing anything... >> >>> >>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt | 4 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt >>> index 5393e2a..a3d51ed 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt >>> @@ -107,11 +107,11 @@ Required properties: >>> Example: >>> >>> interrupt-controller@2c001000 { >>> - compatible = "arm,cortex-a15-gic"; >>> + compatible = "arm,gic-400"; >> >> Which one is correct really depends on the platform. The A15 can have an >> internal or external (gic-400) GIC. The former string is correct for an >> A15 with an internal GIC. One such platform is Calxeda midway. >> >> Arguably, we should not have arm,gic-400 by itself, but have an SoC >> specific compatible in case it was integrated in interesting ways. > > Good point (and thanks for bringing it up). > > Marc, based on this; want to back the above out so we can apply the rest for > now, while you battle on the compatible details? :) Fair enough. I'll back that out, respin and resend. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html