On 25/01/2017 15:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Marek Szyprowski > <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> On 2017-01-25 08:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 24 January 2017 at 19:18, Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Since commit 2164a476205ccc ("usb: dwc3: set SUSPHY bit for all cores"), >>>>> the USB ports on odroid-XU4 don't work anymore. >>>>> >>>>> Inserting an usb key (USB2.0) on the USB3.0 port result in: >>>>> [ 64.488264] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.2.auto: Port resume took longer than >>>>> 20000 msec, port status = 0xc400fe3 >>>>> [ 74.568156] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.2.auto: xHCI host not responding to >>>>> stop endpoint command. >>>>> [ 74.574806] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.2.auto: Assuming host is dying, halting >>>>> host. >>>>> [ 74.601970] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.2.auto: HC died; cleaning up >>>>> [ 74.606276] usb 3-1: USB disconnect, device number 2 >>>>> [ 74.613565] usb 4-1: USB disconnect, device number 2 >>>>> [ 74.621208] usb usb3-port1: couldn't allocate usb_device >>>>> NB: it's not related to USB2.0 devices, I get the same result with an >>>>> USB3.0 device (SATA to USB3 for instance). >>>>> NB2: it doesn't happen on an odriod-XU3 board, that doesn't have the >>>>> realtek RTL8153 chip. >>>>> >>>>> If the lines: >>>>> if (dwc->revision > DWC3_REVISION_194A) >>>>> reg |= DWC3_GUSB3PIPECTL_SUSPHY; >>>>> are commented out, the USB3.0 start working. >>>>> >>>>> For a full analyse: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/18/678 >>>>> >>>>> Felipe suggested that suspend should be disabled temporarily while >>>>> what's wrong with DCW3 is figured out. >>>>> >>>>> Tested on Odroid XU4 >>>>> >>>>> Suggested-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Tested-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.4+ >>>>> Fixes: 2164a476205ccc ("usb: dwc3: set SUSPHY bit for all cores") >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu4.dts | 9 +++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu4.dts >>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu4.dts >>>>> index 2faf88627a48..f62dbd9b5ad3 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu4.dts >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu4.dts >>>>> @@ -43,6 +43,15 @@ >>>>> status = "okay"; >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> +&usbdrd_dwc3_0 { >>>>> + /* >>>>> + * without that, usb devices are not recognized when >>>>> + * they are plugged. >>>>> + * cf: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/18/678 >>>>> + */ >>>>> + snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk; >>>>> +}; >>>>> + >>>>> &usbdrd_dwc3_1 { >>>>> dr_mode = "host"; >>>>> }; >>>>> -- >>>> >>>> Thanks for this patch. >>>> But could you consider moving this changes as below. >>>> >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/18/400 >>> >>> The patch above (and other DTS patches from the set) was not even sent >>> to linux-samsung-soc nor to me... It is sad how easily one's work can >>> disappear. Also, it is really worthless to solve the same problem >>> twice. >> >> >> Well, they were sent about 2 years ago... and you were also working on this >> topic. ;) > > Nope, I have never worked on this. That time I was in Korea so my > tasks were completely different. Later when I got back, I took for a > second U3 OTG which was not involving this thing. > >>> Cc Marek and Bartlomiej, >>> Guys, do you want to continue with Robert's patch (linked above by >>> Anand)? If yes, please take the ownership (Robert's address is not >>> valid anymore). If not, I will take Richard's patch after >>> resubmission. >> >> >> Take Richard's patch because it has a bit more details describing why such >> quirk >> is needed. >> >> Richard: in Roberts patch there is also a quirk for USB 2.0 mode >> (snps,dis_u2_susphy_quirk). Could you check if it really needed? >> >> Maybe it would make sense to set those quirks for both DWC3 controllers, as >> this >> issue with PHY suspend seems to be a Exynos specific thing. > > Okay, > Richard, please continue with your patch. Ok, I'll grab a XU3 & XU4 and do some more tests. But I didn't recall having problems with the XU3 board. I'll try to add a hub or something. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html