On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 21 November 2013 11:45 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>> From: KV Sujith <sujithkv@xxxxxx>
>> +
>> + gpio_pins: pinmux_gpio_pins {
>> + pinctrl-single,bits = <
>> + /* GPIO2_4 GPIO2_6 */
>> + 0x18 0x00008080 0x0000f0f0
>> + /* GPIO2_8 GPIO2_15 */
>> + 0x14 0x80000008 0xf000000f
>> + /* GPIO3_12 GPIO3_13 */
>> + 0x1C 0x00008800 0x0000ff00
>> + /* GPIO4_0 GPIO4_1 */
>> + 0x28 0x88000000 0xff000000
>> + /* GPIO6_9 GPIO6_10 GPIO6_13 */
>> + 0x34 0x08800800 0x0ff00f00
>> + >;
>> + };
>> };
>
> Shouldn't these pinmux entries be part of actual device
> node which needs them to be muxed this way?
The usual way to do it is to set up as states for the device,
or as a hog (on the pin controller itself).
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
