On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:05:01PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > Thanks for the fast feedback! I have handled all your comments and > tested the resulting version on my RN102 w/o problems. Will send a > v4 in a few minutes. > > Can you just look at first comment below? > > Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Ebalard <arno@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> This is a resend - just in case the initial mail slept through - as I > >> got no feedback over the past week. I have also Cc'ed additional > >> people. > >> > > Looks like your mailer corrupts the patch. You'll have to fix that. > > If you wonder about the text below the SoB, this is just informational, I know. > i.e. to avoid having it in the final commit. Can you be more specific > if this is not what you meant, i.e. how the patch is otherwise > corrupted? > I saved the patch and tried to run it through checkpatch. Doing so, I got a lot of errors with "=3D" or similar, which suggests that the patch went through Outlook, an Exchange server, or a similar e-mail "beautifier" when it was sent. If the same happens again, I'll send you a log. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
