Hello Marc, On 01/18/2017 07:53 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Since everybody copied my own mistake from the DT binding example, > let's address all the offenders in one swift go. > > Most of them got the CPU interface size wrong (4kB, while it should > be 8kB), except for both keystone platforms which got the control > interface wrong (4kB instead of 8kB). > > In the couple of cases were I knew for sure what implementation > was used, I've added the "arm,gic-400" compatible string. I'm 99% > sure that this is what everyong is using, but short of having the > TRM for all the other SoCs, I've let them alone. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 2 +- I've looked at the Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 TRM and both say that adopts GIC-400, so I think it's safe for you to also update the compatible in the exynos5.dtsi. Unfortunately I don't have manuals for 3250, 5260 and 5440. The register map changes looks good to me, so for Exynos: Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
