Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt/bindings: da8xx-usb: Add binding for the CPPI 4.1 DMA controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Rob,

On Wednesday 18 January 2017 03:00 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 1/18/2017 11:33 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> 
>>>> DT binding for the TI DA8xx/OMAP-L1x/AM17xx/AM18xx cppi41 dma
>>>> controller.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/usb/da8xx-usb.txt          | 42
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/da8xx-usb.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/da8xx-usb.txt
>>>> index ccb844a..aed3169 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/da8xx-usb.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/da8xx-usb.txt
>>>> @@ -18,10 +18,26 @@ Required properties:
>>>>
>>>>   - phy-names: Should be "usb-phy"
>>>>
>>>> + - dmas: specifies the dma channels
>>>> +
>>>> + - dma-names: specifies the names of the channels. Use "rxN" for
>>>> receive
>>>> +   and "txN" for transmit endpoints. N specifies the endpoint number.
>>>> +
>>>>  Optional properties:
>>>>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>   - vbus-supply: Phandle to a regulator providing the USB bus power.
>>>>
>>>> +DMA
>>>> +~~~
>>>> +- compatible: ti,da8xx-cppi41
>>>
>>>    Almost missed this -- wildcards in this property are forbidden.
>>> We should use "ti,da830-cppi41" as a least common denominator.
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt states:
>>
>> "
>>   5) The wildcard "<chip>" may be used in compatible strings, as in
>>      the following example:
>>
>>          - compatible: Must contain '"nvidia,<chip>-pcie",
>>            "nvidia,tegra20-pcie"' where <chip> is tegra30, tegra132, ...
>> "
>>
>> I take this to mean that using wildcards to denote an SoC family on
>> which the same IP is present is okay to do.> With that understanding, I
>> think using ti,da8xx-cppi41 is fine too.
> 
>    It doesn't really follow. I repeat, x's are not allowed.

Can you clarify here? If x's are indeed not allowed, then I think the
document is being ambiguous about what constitutes "The wildcard "<chip>""

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux