On 12/16/2013 05:18 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Mon, December 16, 2013, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>> On 12/16/2013 03:29 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>>> On Mon, December 16, 2013, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>>>> Dear Seungwon
>>>>
>>>> On 12/16/2013 11:50 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, December 14, 2013, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> + /* SoC portion */
>>>>>> + dwmmc_0: dwmmc0@fcd03000 {
>>>>>> + compatible = "hisilicon,hi4511-dw-mshc";
>>>>>> + reg = <0xfcd03000 0x1000>;
>>>>>> + interrupts = <0 16 4>;
>>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + clocks = <&mmc_clock HI3620_SD_CIUCLK>, <&clock HI3620_DDRC_PER_CLK>;
>>>>>> + clock-names = "ciu", "biu";
>>>>>> + clock-freq-table =
>>>>>> + <25000000 0 50000000 25000000 50000000 100000000 0 50000000>;
>>>>> I think it could be solved with mmc->f_min and mmc->f_max(from clock-freq-min-max property)
>>>>> if there is no limitation per each speed mode. As seeing described table, it looks that.
>>>>
>>>> Have tried them before, but unfortunately, they are different.
>>>>
>>>> The controller can not generate clock itself, while depending on the
>>>> outside clock generator, which may require to change clock source in
>>>> differnt mode.
>>>>
>>>> The value we want is set the capacibility of the clock input and the max
>>>> clock freq where mmc works stable in that mode, which may be different
>>>> in different mode.
>>>>
>>>> clock-freq-min-max will set the value for set_ios.
>>>> For example, we use 25M as clock capability when init, which can not be
>>>> set as freq-min, and used as set_ios, where 400K should be used,
>>>> otherwise init definitely fail.
>>> Can you check 'f_init' within 'drivers/mmc/core/core.c' file?
>>> If you set 'f_min = 25000000' for init-sequence, mmc_set_ios() will pass that rate through
>> 'ios.clock'
>>> Then, dw_mmc-k3 can do clk_set_rate() with 25MHz at dw_mci_k3_set_ios().
>>
>> This means controller directly use 25M init emmc and sd card, it will fail.
>> We still need 400K init freq, while the input clock source is 25M,
>> divided by the controller.
>>
>>> And other required speeds for each mode seem not specific compared with standard spec.
>>> Also clk_set_rate() would be possible with 'ios.clock' instead of specific table.
>>> I just referred your example's clock-freq-table above.
>> There also some controller limitation currently.
>> In some mode, the controller only works well in the limited freq.
>> For example UHS_SDR104_MAX_DTR 208000000 can not be used, only half may
>> be reached, at least currently
> Ok. I see your condition. I misunderstood a little bit.
> I wonder whether limitation is only max frequency(SDR104 or HS200) except for init-freq.
> How about other mode? Working is fine with normal clock rate(from clock-freq-table)?
>
The root cause is the controller can not generate stable clock itself,
but depends on outside clock source, which is varying, and driver need
to decide input clock rate / choose clock source according to the
working mode.
Three cases here:
1. Input rate for init are diferent for different controller, not the
init 400K, some are 13M, others are 25M, since different clock source.
This can be easily solved by clock-freq-init = <25000000>
2. There is maxmum limit, also can be easily solved by define CLK_MAX.
For example, CLK_MAX = 180M.
3. However some mode can not use the max speed from ios->clock
for example UHS_SDR104_MAX_DTR 208000000 can not be used, only half may
be reached, at least currently.
The third case is current limitation, after this limitation is solved,
we can switch to ios->clock directly.
Considering all these cases, we think using table is more suitable now.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
