On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:49:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> > The ARM Mali Utgard GPU family is embedded into a number of SoCs from >> > Allwinner, Amlogic, Mediatek or Rockchip. >> > >> > Add a binding for the GPU of that family. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > .../devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) >> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt >> >> Do you have a driver in kernel which will implement these bindings? > > No, but we have bindings for out-of-tree drivers already. > >> Defining them for out-of-tree driver does not bring any benefits >> (3rd party driver will not respect them anyway). > > You could see it the other way around too. The out-of-tree drivers > don't respect it at the moment because there's no binding to respect. Indeed, that's a point. However valid only when the out-of-tree driver will respect them, for example do not break them on next release. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
