On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 15:05 +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> This patch adds reset controller driver for ZTE's zx2967 family.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/reset/Kconfig | 6 ++
> drivers/reset/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/reset/reset-zx2967.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 143 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/reset/reset-zx2967.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> index 172dc96..972d077 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> @@ -92,6 +92,12 @@ config RESET_ZYNQ
> help
> This enables the reset controller driver for Xilinx Zynq SoCs.
>
> +config RESET_ZX2967
> + bool "ZX2967 Reset Driver"
> + depends on ARCH_ZX || COMPILE_TEST
> + help
> + This enables the reset controller driver for ZTE zx2967 family.
> +
> source "drivers/reset/sti/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/reset/hisilicon/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/reset/tegra/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/Makefile b/drivers/reset/Makefile
> index 13b346e..807b77b 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/reset/Makefile
> @@ -14,3 +14,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_SUNXI) += reset-sunxi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SYSCON_RESET) += reset-ti-syscon.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_UNIPHIER) += reset-uniphier.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_ZYNQ) += reset-zynq.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_ZX2967) += reset-zx2967.o
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-zx2967.c b/drivers/reset/reset-zx2967.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..63f9c41
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-zx2967.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> +/*
> + * ZTE's zx2967 family thermal sensor driver
This description is incorrect.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 ZTE Ltd.
> + *
> + * Author: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> +
> +struct zx2967_reset {
> + void __iomem *reg_base;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
> +};
> +
> +static int zx2967_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + struct zx2967_reset *reset = NULL;
> + int bank = id / 32;
> + int offset = id % 32;
> + unsigned int reg;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + reset = container_of(rcdev, struct zx2967_reset, rcdev);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&reset->lock, flags);
> +
> + reg = readl(reset->reg_base + (bank * 4));
> + writel(reg & ~BIT(offset), reset->reg_base + (bank * 4));
> + reg = readl(reset->reg_base + (bank * 4));
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&reset->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int zx2967_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + struct zx2967_reset *reset = NULL;
> + int bank = id / 32;
> + int offset = id % 32;
> + unsigned int reg;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + reset = container_of(rcdev, struct zx2967_reset, rcdev);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&reset->lock, flags);
> +
> + reg = readl(reset->reg_base + (bank * 4));
> + writel(reg | BIT(offset), reset->reg_base + (bank * 4));
> + reg = readl(reset->reg_base + (bank * 4));
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&reset->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct reset_control_ops zx2967_reset_ops = {
> + .assert = zx2967_reset_assert,
> + .deassert = zx2967_reset_deassert,
> +};
> +
> +static int zx2967_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct zx2967_reset *reset;
> + struct resource *res;
> +
> + reset = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*reset), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!reset)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + reset->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(reset->reg_base))
> + return PTR_ERR(reset->reg_base);
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&reset->lock);
> +
> + reset->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + reset->rcdev.nr_resets = resource_size(res) * 8;
> + reset->rcdev.ops = &zx2967_reset_ops;
> + reset->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "reset controller cnt:%d",
> + reset->rcdev.nr_resets);
> +
> + return reset_controller_register(&reset->rcdev);
As Shawn suggested, use the devm_ variant here. It allows you to drop
the remove function below.
> +}
> +
> +static int zx2967_reset_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct zx2967_reset *reset = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + reset_controller_unregister(&reset->rcdev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id zx2967_reset_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "zte,zx296718-reset", },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zx2967_reset_dt_ids);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver zx2967_reset_driver = {
> + .probe = zx2967_reset_probe,
> + .remove = zx2967_reset_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "zx2967-reset",
> + .of_match_table = zx2967_reset_dt_ids,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init zx2967_reset_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&zx2967_reset_driver);
> +}
> +arch_initcall(zx2967_reset_init);
> +
> +static void __exit zx2967_reset_exit(void)
> +{
> + platform_driver_unregister(&zx2967_reset_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(zx2967_reset_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ZTE zx2967 Reset Controller Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
