Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] powernv:stop: Uniformly rename power9 to arch300

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Gautham R Shenoy
<ego@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:17:33PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:37:01PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
>> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Balbir pointed out that in idle_book3s.S and powernv/idle.c some
>> > functions and variables had power9 in their names while some others
>> > had arch300.
>> >
>>
>> I would prefer power9 to arch300
>>
>
>
> I don't have a strong preference for arch300 vs power9, will change it
> to power9 if that looks better.

Personally I think we should be as descriptive as possible and use
power_9_arch_300_the_bikeshed_is_red_dammit.

Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux