On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:53:17AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Rockchip's RC outputs 100MHz reference clock but there are
> two methods for PHY to generate it.
>
> (1)One of them is to use system PLL to generate 100MHz clock and
> the PHY will relock it and filter signal noise then outputs the
> reference clock.
>
> (2)Another way is to share Soc's 24MHZ crystal oscillator with
> PHY and force PHY's DLL to generate 100MHz internally.
>
> When using case(2), the exit from L0s doesn't work fine occasionally
> due to the broken design of RC receiver's logical circuit. So even if
> we use extended-synch, it still fails for PHY to relock the bits from
> FTS sometimes. This will hang the system.
>
> Maybe we could argue that why not use case(1) to avoid it? The reason
> is that as we could see the reference clock is derived from system PLL
> and the path from it to PHY isn't so clean which means there are some
> noise introduced by power-domain and other buses can't be filterd out
> by PHY and we could see noise from the frequency spectrum by
> oscilloscope. This makes the TX compatibility test a little difficult
> to pass the spec. So case(1) and case(2) are both used indeed now. If
> using case(2), we should disable RC's L0s support, and that is why we
> need this property to indicate this quirk.
>
> Also after checking quirk.c, I noticed there is already a quirk for
> disabling L0s unconditionally, quirk_disable_aspm_l0s. But obviously we
> shouldn't do that as mentioned above that case(1) could still works fine
> with L0s.
>
> Reported-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I applied this to pci/host-rockchip for v4.11. I added Brian's Reviewed-by
and Rob's Acked-by, since you didn't change anything substantive.
I assume there's no way to automatically discover whether the system is
using the 24MHz oscillator? If there is a way, we should use that instead
of requiring a DT property.
I reworded the changelog; I hope it still make sense:
PCI: rockchip: Disable RC's ASPM L0s based on DT "aspm-no-l0s"
Rockchip's RC produces a 100MHz reference clock but there are two methods
for the PHY to generate it:
(1) Use the system PLL to generate a 100MHz clock. The PHY will relock
it, filter signal noise, and output the reference clock. ASPM L0s
works correctly, but circuit noise issues make it difficult to pass
the TX compatibility test.
(2) Share the SoC's 24MHZ crystal oscillator with the PHY and force the
PHY's PLL to generate 100MHz internally. In this case, exit from
ASPM L0s sometimes fails due to a design error in the RC receiver
circuit. Even if we use extended-synch, the PHY sometimes fails to
relock the bits from FTS, which will hang the system.
We want the flexibility to use both clocking methods, so add a DT property,
"aspm-no-l0s". If that's present, disable L0s to avoid the issues with
case (2).
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Reported-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - fix misspelled aspm for the property name
>
> Changes in v2:
> - drop the quirk prefix
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-pcie.txt | 2 ++
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-pcie.txt
> index 71aeda1..1453a73 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-pcie.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-pcie.txt
> @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ Required properties:
> - interrupt-map-mask and interrupt-map: standard PCI properties
>
> Optional Property:
> +- aspm-no-l0s: RC won't support ASPM L0s. This property is needed if
> + using 24MHz OSC for RC's PHY.
> - ep-gpios: contain the entry for pre-reset gpio
> - num-lanes: number of lanes to use
> - vpcie3v3-supply: The phandle to the 3.3v regulator to use for PCIe.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c
> index f2dca7b..140cdc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,8 @@
> #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_SHIFT 18
> #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_LIMIT 0xff
> #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CPLS_SHIFT 26
> +#define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xcc)
> +#define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP_L0S BIT(10)
> #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
> #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_L1_SUBSTATE_CTRL2 (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0x90c)
> #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_THP_CAP (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0x274)
> @@ -653,6 +655,13 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> status &= ~PCIE_RC_CONFIG_THP_CAP_NEXT_MASK;
> rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_THP_CAP);
>
> + /* Clear L0s from RC's link cap */
> + if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "aspm-no-l0s")) {
> + status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP);
> + status &= ~PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP_L0S;
> + rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP);
> + }
> +
> rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, 0x0, PCIE_RC_BAR_CONF);
>
> rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip,
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
