Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Adding DT support for TI HECC module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




* Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [170112 07:33]:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Yegor Yefremov
> <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> * Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [170111 13:52]:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:05 PM,  <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> > From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> >
> >>> > This is an attempt to revive DT support for TI HECC that was started in 2015.
> >>> >
> >>> > I haven't changed much because not all questions could be fully answered:
> >>> >
> >>> > * Should HECC use "am3505" as compatible?
> >>>
> >>> I mean "ti,am3505-hecc"
> >>
> >> Yeah it should use the device name for the driver.
> 
> I've looked at drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_emac.c and there
> "ti,am3517-emac" will be used. Should we stick to am3517? am3505 won't
> be used in any dts[i] file.

If they are the same, then usually the earliest hardware naming can be
used for later versions too. I don't know which was first am3517 or
3505. If you think "ti,am3517-hecc" makes sense I'm fine with that.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux