On 01/09, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On 12/22/2016 01:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >On 12/13, gabriel.fernandez@xxxxxx wrote: > >>From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@xxxxxx> > >> > >>Creation of dt include file for specific stm32f4 clocks. > >>These specific clocks are not derived from system clock (SYSCLOCK) > >>We should use index 1 to use these clocks in DT. > >>e.g. <&rcc 1 CLK_LSI> > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@xxxxxx> > >>Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>--- > > > >Applied to clk-stm32f4 and merged into clk-next. > > > > I'm preparing pull request branch for STM32 DT part. This patch is > also requested to build correctly DT patches. Do you know how could > we synchronize our pull request ? > clk-stm32f4 is stable and not going to be rebased, so you're good to base patches on it and send it off to arm-soc if the arm-soc maintainers agree to it. You can also base off an earlier part of the branch if you only need this first patch for example. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
