Yes, I meant what you think I meant. :) thanks W dniu 06.01.2017 o 12:54, Sudeep Holla pisze: > Hi Michał, > > On 05/01/17 19:04, Michał Zegan wrote: >> Hello. >> >> The patch causes cpufreq module (scpi-cpufreq) not to detect cpufreq, so >> it actually works, but... >> Loading the module causes few errors because of not found frequencies or >> something, then it is all okay. However after loading scpi-cpufreq you >> cannot actually power the cpu off and on. You will power it off >> successfully, but when trying to power it on, the cpufreq driver will >> error out, > > Yes I had noticed this in past, this needs to be fixed. I had a patch > and seems like it slipped through the cracks. I will fins and post it. > >> and then after it happens, the cpu that was trying to go >> online will be offline again, and that is a little... unfortunate. The > > IIUC, you mean the cpufreq drive spits error on every hotplug event ? > If so yes, otherwise I think I didn't understand you concern above. > >> question is, and I cannot really test that: will the module actually >> autoload after this change? >> > > It should work, I had tested this in past. >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
