On 06-01-17, 14:16, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > On 12/12/2016 04:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of > > their Power Domains. The performance levels are represented by positive > > integer values, a lower value represents lower performance state. > > > > The power-domains until now were only concentrating on the idle state > > management of the device and this needs to change in order to reuse the > > infrastructure of power domains for active state management. > > > > This patch adds binding to describe the performance states of a power > > domain. > > The bindings would also need to take into account the fact that a device > could (and is quite often the case with qcom platforms) have 2 separate > powerdomains, one for idle state management and another to manage active > states. I guess the below bindings assume that there's just one. I have answered a similar question here.. https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148067565219477&w=2 -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
