On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:54:17AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > > > + compatible = "pwm-backlight"; > > > + pwms = <&pwm2 0 500000>; > > > + power-supply = <®_3v3>; > > > + brightness-levels = < > > > + 100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 > > > + 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 > > > + 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 > > > + 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 > > > + 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 > > > + 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 > > > + 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 > > > + 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 > > > + 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 > > > + 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 > > > + 0 > > > > Why is it so unique to start with 100 and end with 0? Does it even > > work? Here is what I read from bindings doc. > > > Yes, it works. The backlight control of the displays we typically use > is active low. This is a poor man's way to get an inverted PWM output! > (And one in which the number written to the sysfs file corresponds to > the actual duty cycle of the PWM output) I think Linux pwm driver should be improved for this case rather than manipulate device tree in a way that violate the defined bindings. Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
