On 2017-01-04 10:29, Phil Reid wrote:
> The spec for the pca954x was missing. This chip is the same as the pca9540
> except that it has interrupt lines. While the i2c_device_id table mapped
> the pca9542 to the pca9540 definition the compatible table did not. In
> preparation for irq support add the pca9542 definition.
A new ACPI table was added behind your back, which needs the same
treatment as the i2c table.
With that fixed,
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
peda
> Signed-off-by: Phil Reid <preid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> index 8bc3d36..981d145 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ struct pca954x {
> .enable = 0x4,
> .muxtype = pca954x_ismux,
> },
> + [pca_9542] = {
> + .nchans = 2,
> + .enable = 0x4,
> + .muxtype = pca954x_ismux,
> + },
> [pca_9543] = {
> .nchans = 2,
> .muxtype = pca954x_isswi,
> @@ -109,7 +114,7 @@ struct pca954x {
>
> static const struct i2c_device_id pca954x_id[] = {
> { "pca9540", pca_9540 },
> - { "pca9542", pca_9540 },
> + { "pca9542", pca_9542 },
> { "pca9543", pca_9543 },
> { "pca9544", pca_9544 },
> { "pca9545", pca_9545 },
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
