* Jason Kridner <jkridner@xxxxxxxxx> [170103 12:30]: > > > > On Jan 3, 2017, at 3:11 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > * Jason Kridner <jkridner@xxxxxxxxx> [161228 13:27]: > >> > >> > >>> On Dec 27, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> BeagleBone Black Wireless is clone of the BeagleBone Black (BBB) with the Ethernet > >>> replaced by a TI wl1835 wireless module. > >>> > >>> This board can be indentified by the BWAx value after A335BNLT (BBB) in the at24 eeprom: > >>> BWAx [aa 55 33 ee 41 33 33 35 42 4e 4c 54 42 57 41 35 |.U3.A335BNLTBWA5|] > >> > >> I believe the correct statement is BWxx, but BWBx reserves the option to be software incompatible in some way. My preference is to have it boot anyway, but I believe that is only dependent in the bootloader. > > > > So does this patch need updating for that? > > No, it is bootloader controlled. What about the patch description? Does it need updating or is that an Acked-by? Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
