On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:35:16PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:30:54PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am 27.11.2016 um 22:17 schrieb Andrew Lunn: > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:54:44PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > > >> Found while reviewing Marvell dsa bindings usage. > > > > > > Hi Andreas > > > > > > It is good practice to put the maintainer you expect to accept the > > > patch on the To: line. You have at least two different maintainers on > > > Cc: so it is currently ambiguous. And these lists can be high volume, > > > so without a copy in the maintainers inbox, patches can be overlooked. > > > > As a vf610 DT patch with LAKML in To I am expecting it to be handled by > > Shawn or anyone from the NXP/ARM side. > > So please have Shawn as To: > > The patch you are fixing went through Dave Miller, who is also on Cc:, > hence the ambiguity. The good practice was broken from the beginning when patch "arm: vf610: zii devel b: Add support for switch interrupts") went through net tree, even without me on copy. Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
