Hi Brian,
I've just posted a v2 patchset after taking care of your your
comments. Please see inline below.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:12:58AM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
>> Some BT chips (e.g. Marvell 8997) contain a wakeup pin that can be
>> connected to a gpio on the CPU side, and can be used to wakeup
>> the host out-of-band. This can be useful in situations where the
>> in-band wakeup is not possible or not preferable (e.g. the in-band
>> wakeup may require the USB host controller to remain active, and
>> hence consuming more system power during system sleep).
>>
>> The oob gpio interrupt to be used for wakeup on the CPU side, is
>> read from the device tree node, (using standard interrupt descriptors).
>> A devcie tree binding document is also added for the driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/btusb.txt | 38 ++++++++++++
>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 120 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/btusb.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/btusb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/btusb.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..bb27f92
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/btusb.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
>> +Generic Bluetooth controller over USB (btusb driver)
>> +---------------------------------------------------
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +
>> + - compatible : should comply with the format "usbVID,PID" specified in
>> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.txt
>> + At the time of writing, the only OF supported devices
>> + (more may be added later) are:
>> +
>> + "usb1286,204e" (Marvell 8997)
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> +
>> + - interrupt-parent: phandle of the parent interrupt controller
>> + - interrupts : The first interrupt specified is the interrupt that shall be
>> + used for out-of-band wake-on-bt. Driver will request an irq
>> + based on this interrupt number. During system suspend, the irq
>> + will be enabled so that the bluetooth chip can wakeup host
>> + platform out of band. During system resume, the irq will be
>> + disabled to make sure unnecessary interrupt is not received.
>
> Might it be worthwhile to define an 'interrupt-names' property (e.g., =
> "wakeup") to help future-proof this?
Good idea, I've used the same.
>
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +Following example uses irq pin number 3 of gpio0 for out of band wake-on-bt:
>> +
>> +&usb_host1_ehci {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + mvl_bt1: bt@1 {
>> + compatible = "usb1286,204e";
>> + reg = <1>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
>> + interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>> + };
>> +};
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> index ce22cef..32a6f22 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/usb.h>
>> #include <linux/firmware.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>> #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>>
>> #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
>> @@ -369,6 +371,7 @@ static const struct usb_device_id blacklist_table[] = {
>> #define BTUSB_BOOTING 9
>> #define BTUSB_RESET_RESUME 10
>> #define BTUSB_DIAG_RUNNING 11
>> +#define BTUSB_OOB_WAKE_DISABLED 12
>>
>> struct btusb_data {
>> struct hci_dev *hdev;
>> @@ -416,6 +419,8 @@ struct btusb_data {
>> int (*recv_bulk)(struct btusb_data *data, void *buffer, int count);
>>
>> int (*setup_on_usb)(struct hci_dev *hdev);
>> +
>> + int oob_wake_irq; /* irq for out-of-band wake-on-bt */
>> };
>>
>> static inline void btusb_free_frags(struct btusb_data *data)
>> @@ -2728,6 +2733,65 @@ static int btusb_bcm_set_diag(struct hci_dev *hdev, bool enable)
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +static irqreturn_t btusb_oob_wake_handler(int irq, void *priv)
>> +{
>> + struct btusb_data *data = priv;
>> +
>> + /* Disable only if not already disabled (keep it balanced) */
>> + if (!test_and_set_bit(BTUSB_OOB_WAKE_DISABLED, &data->flags)) {
>> + disable_irq_wake(irq);
>> + disable_irq_nosync(irq);
>> + }
>> + pm_wakeup_event(&data->udev->dev, 0);
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id btusb_match_table[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "usb1286,204e" },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, btusb_match_table);
>> +
>> +/* Use an oob wakeup pin? */
>> +static int btusb_config_oob_wake(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>> +{
>> + struct btusb_data *data = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
>> + struct device *dev = &data->udev->dev;
>> + int irq, ret;
>> +
>> + if (!of_match_device(btusb_match_table, dev))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* Move on if no IRQ specified */
>> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dev->of_node, 0);
>
> Better to use of_irq_get{,_byname}(), no?
I've used_irq_get_byname().
>
>> + if (!irq) {
>> + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "%s: no oob wake irq in DT", __func__);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + set_bit(BTUSB_OOB_WAKE_DISABLED, &data->flags);
>> +
>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&hdev->dev, irq, btusb_oob_wake_handler,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW, "oob wake-on-bt", data);
>
> You're assuming this is level-triggered, and active-low? Can't this just
> be specified in the device tree and just pass 0 here?
>
> Also, it seems like it would be a lot more convenient if we could treat
> this as edge-triggered, so we don't have to do the set/clear flags,
> disable IRQ, etc., dance. You'd just have to change the device tree
> definition. Is there any downside to doing that?
Now, I don't put any assumptions in the driver and use whatever is
specified in the device tree. So platforms can do whatever they want
(However, I think configuring as edge triggered in the device tree (if
some platform chooses to) may leave some corner cases where the
interrupt might be missed if it was already asserted for some reason).
Thanks,
Rajat
>
> It would also then be a better candidate for using something like
> dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq() (although last time I tried using that,
> it didn't do so great if you don't have autosuspend enabled -- but I
> think there are patches outstanding for that; so maybe not yet).
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + bt_dev_err(hdev, "%s: irq request failed", __func__);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + bt_dev_err(hdev, "%s: failed to init_wakeup\n", __func__);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + data->oob_wake_irq = irq;
>> + disable_irq(irq);
>> + bt_dev_info(hdev, "oob wake-on-bt configured at irq %u\n", irq);
>
> oob and bt are typically capitalized in strings. And maybe irq too.
> Also, you declared irq as 'int', so %d instead of %u.
>
> Brian
>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>> const struct usb_device_id *id)
>> {
>> @@ -2849,6 +2913,11 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>> hdev->send = btusb_send_frame;
>> hdev->notify = btusb_notify;
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> + err = btusb_config_oob_wake(hdev);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto out_free_dev;
>> +#endif
>> if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_CW6622)
>> set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_STORED_LINK_KEY, &hdev->quirks);
>>
>> @@ -3089,6 +3158,12 @@ static int btusb_suspend(struct usb_interface *intf, pm_message_t message)
>> btusb_stop_traffic(data);
>> usb_kill_anchored_urbs(&data->tx_anchor);
>>
>> + if (data->oob_wake_irq) {
>> + clear_bit(BTUSB_OOB_WAKE_DISABLED, &data->flags);
>> + enable_irq(data->oob_wake_irq);
>> + enable_irq_wake(data->oob_wake_irq);
>> + }
>> +
>> /* Optionally request a device reset on resume, but only when
>> * wakeups are disabled. If wakeups are enabled we assume the
>> * device will stay powered up throughout suspend.
>> @@ -3126,6 +3201,13 @@ static int btusb_resume(struct usb_interface *intf)
>> if (--data->suspend_count)
>> return 0;
>>
>> + /* Disable only if not already disabled (keep it balanced) */
>> + if (data->oob_wake_irq &&
>> + !test_and_set_bit(BTUSB_OOB_WAKE_DISABLED, &data->flags)) {
>> + disable_irq_wake(data->oob_wake_irq);
>> + disable_irq(data->oob_wake_irq);
>> + }
>> +
>> if (!test_bit(HCI_RUNNING, &hdev->flags))
>> goto done;
>>
>> --
>> 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
