On 13/12/16 16:31, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> On 13/12/16 15:22, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >>> A "cpu0" label is needed on cpu@0 for cpufreq-dt to work. >>> >> >> IIUC any label should be fine and I don't see anything in the driver >> looking for such label name. All I see is it looks for cpu0 regulator >> for *legacy* DTs >> >>> Add such a label, in order to prepare for cpufreq support of A23/33. >>> >> >> You need this as you add the same label in the following patches. The >> commit message sounds like cpufreq-dt search for that label by name. > > I think a more proper explanation would be: > > The cpu's supply regulator is specified at the board level, hence we > need to add a label to it to reference it without replicating the whole > tree structure. Thanks for clarifying, was confused based on the commit log. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
