On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
>> +static ssize_t store_scan(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf,
>> + size_t count)
>> +{
>> + struct fsi_master_gpio *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + fsi_master_gpio_init(master);
>> +
>> + /* clear out any old scan data if present */
>> + fsi_master_unregister(&master->master);
>> + fsi_master_register(&master->master);
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(scan, 0200, NULL, store_scan);
>
> I think it would make more sense to have the scan attribute populated by
> the fsi core; we want this on all masters, not just GPIO.
>
Hi Jeremy,
Sure, will move that to the core.
> Currently, the only GPIO-master-specific functionality here is the
> fsi_master_gpio_init() - but isn't this something that we can do at
> probe time instead?
>
Yes that can be done at probe time. Will change.
>> +static int fsi_master_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct fsi_master_gpio *master;
>> + struct gpio_desc *gpio;
>> +
>> + master = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*master), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!master)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> We should be populating master->dev.parent, see
>
> https://github.com/jk-ozlabs/linux/commit/5225d6c47
>
>
Will make the change.
>> + /* Optional pins */
>> +
>> + gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "trans", 0);
>> + if (IS_ERR(gpio))
>> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "probe: failed to get trans pin\n");
>> + else
>> + master->gpio_trans = gpio;
>
> I found devm_gpiod_get_optional(), which might make this a little
> neater.
Will make this change.
Thanks,
Chris
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Jeremy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
