On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 05:40:12PM +0100, Volodymyr Bendiuga wrote: > Yes, most of the users of of_irq_get() do not use irq_dispose_mapping(). > > But some of them do (some irq chips), and I believe the correct way > of doing this is to > > dispose irq mapping, as the description for this function says that > it unmaps > > the irq, which is mapped by of_irq_parse_and_map(). Not disposing > irq might not make > > any affect on most drivers, but some, that get EPROBE_DEFER error do > need to dispose. > > This is what I get when I run the code. > > of_irq_put() could be implemented, and it would be a wrapper for > irq_dispose_mapping() > > as I can see it. Should I do it this way? Hi Volodymyr Yes, i think having of_irq_put() would be good. It gives some symmetry to the API. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
