On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/05/2016 12:28 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Guilherme G. Piccoli >> <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On PowerPC machines some PCI slots might not have level triggered >>> interrupts capability (also know as level signaled interrupts), >>> leading of_irq_parse_pci() to complain by presenting error messages >>> on the kernel log - in this case, the properties "interrupt-map" and >>> "interrupt-map-mask" are not present on device's node in the device >>> tree. >>> >>> This patch introduces a different message for this specific case, >>> and also reduces its level from error to warning. Besides, we warn >>> (once) that possibly some PCI slots on the system have no level >>> triggered interrupts available. >>> We changed some error return codes too on function of_irq_parse_raw() >>> in order other failure's cases can be presented in a more precise way. >>> >>> Before this patch, when an adapter was plugged in a slot without level >>> interrupts capabilitiy on PowerPC, we saw a generic error message >>> like this: >>> >>> [54.239] pci 002d:70:00.0: of_irq_parse_pci() failed with rc=-22 >>> >>> Now, with this applied, we see the following specific message: >>> >>> [16.154] pci 0014:60:00.1: of_irq_parse_pci: no interrupt-map found, >>> INTx interrupts not available >>> >>> Finally, we standardize the error path in of_irq_parse_raw() by always >>> taking the fail path instead of returning directly from the loop. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> >>> v2: >>> * Changed function return code to always return negative values; >> >> Are you sure this is safe? This is tricky because of differing values >> of NO_IRQ (0 or -1). > > Thanks Rob, but this is purely bad wording from myself. I'm sorry - I > meant to say that I changed only my positive return code (that was > suggested to be removed in the prior revision) to negative return code! > > So, I changed only code I added myself in v1 =) > > >> >>> * Improved/simplified warning outputs; >>> * Changed some return codes and some error paths in of_irq_parse_raw() >>> in order to be more precise/consistent; >> >> This too could have some side effects on callers. >> >> Not saying don't do these changes, just need some assurances this has >> been considered. > > Thanks for your attention. I performed a quick investigation before > changing this, all the places that use the return values are just > getting "true/false" information from that, meaning they just are > comparing to 0 basically. So change -EINVAL to -ENOENT wouldn't hurt any > user of these return values, it'll only become more informative IMHO. > > Now, regarding the only error path that was changed: for some reason, > this was the only place in which we didn't goto fail label in case of > failure - it was added by a legacy commit from Ben, dated from 2006: > 006b64de60 ("[POWERPC] Make OF irq map code detect more error cases"). > Then it was carried by Grant Likely's commit 7dc2e1134a ("of/irq: merge > irq mapping code"), 6-year old commit. > I wasn't able to imagine a scenario in which changing this would break > something; I believe the change improve consistency, but I'd remove it > if you or somebody else thinks it worth be removed. Okay. It's a bit late for 4.10 now and want this to be in -next for a while, so I'll queue it after the merge window. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html