Hi Mark, On Tuesday 06 Dec 2016 13:20:20 Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:46:55PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 Dec 2016 10:05:17 Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:16:22PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > This has been discussed previously, and Rob agreed that if the > > > > datasheet recommends to power all supplies from the same regulator we > > > > can take that as a good hint that a single supply should be enough. In > > > > the very > > > > > > No, don't do this - introducing special snowflake bindings just makes > > > things more complex at the system level and tells everyone else that > > > they too can have special snowflake bindings. Someone should be able to > > > connect up the regulators based purely on a schematic. Just describe > > > the hardware, it's just one extra line in the DT per regulator. > > > > There are power supply pin that have different names but documented as > > having to be connected to the same supply. I really see no point in > > having multiple regulators for them. > > The tiny amount of extra typing involved doesn't seem like much of a > cost for keeping things consistent with every other regulator user out > there. I'm not concerned by that at all, but by the additional runtime complexity :-/ -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
