Hi, On 02/12/2016 at 15:09:55 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote : > This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the STM32 RTC. > > Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..4578838 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ > +STM32 Real Time Clock > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: "st,stm32-rtc". > +- reg: address range of rtc register set. > +- clocks: reference to the clock entry ck_rtc. > +- clock-names: name of the clock used. Should be "ck_rtc". Is this name really useful? > +- interrupt-parent: phandle for the interrupt controller. > +- interrupts: rtc alarm interrupt. > +- interrupt-names: rtc alarm interrupt name, should be "alarm". Same comment, is this name really useful? -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html