Hello Heiko! Thank you for patch review! > 29 нояб. 2016 г., в 18:01, Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> написал(а): > > you introduced the issue yourself in patch 11/13. In general any patch should > never leave the kernel in a worse state than it was before, so no patch should > ever introduce known issues itself. Agree. > In that line of thought, don't patches 10+11 introduce warnings about unused > functions as well when applied without patch 12? 7 - yes 10 - not 11 - yes > 29 нояб. 2016 г., в 18:03, Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> написал(а): > > Then why do you need another patch to remove them and don't do that in the > patch removing their respective usage? To make 7 more readable. Overwise patch messed up and unreadable. It’s hard to track what going on in the patch. > Maybe merge them? I'll merge all of them. P.S. here comment from another thead about the patches. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-November/thread.html#470957 > 29 нояб. 2016 г., в 18:07, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> написал(а): > > 3288 (and probably anything newer) is irrelevant to this discussion, as > it has the arch timer interface - that may be busted in other ways (such > as not being correctly set up by firmware and not being always-on as it > should), but frequency is not one of them. This only affects > Cortex-A9/A5 based parts. So I update comments for patches. Looks, like I study archeology with my patches, as all new ARM chips not affected by the problem anymore. Regards, Alexander. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
