On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> * Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> [161121 03:43]: >> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile >> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile >> > > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MC13XXX_I2C) += mc13xxx-i2c.o >> > > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_CORE) += mfd-core.o >> > > >> > > obj-$(CONFIG_EZX_PCAP) += ezx-pcap.o >> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_CPCAP) += cpcap.o >> > >> > Who is the manufacturer? >> >> Hmm that I don't know. There seems to be both ST and TI versions >> of this chip manufactured for Motorola. So my guess is that it >> should be Motorola unless there's some similar catalog part >> available from ST used by others. If anybody has more info >> on this please let me know :) > > If this IP is shared amongst vendors, it usually means it was designed > by someone else? Synopsis perhaps? xCAP names originated from Motorola cellular group with parts (going back to analog/2G days) coming from Motorola Semi, TI, and ST it seems. All individually developed AFAIK. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
