On 21/11/2016 12:49, Ding Tianhong wrote:
Ping....
Hi,
was there a cover letter for 0/6? I never saw it.
Thanks,
John
On 2016/11/15 20:16, Ding Tianhong wrote:
This erratum describes a bug in logic outside the core, so MIDR can't be
used to identify its presence, and reading an SoC-specific revision
register from common arch timer code would be awkward. So, describe it
in the device tree.
v2: Use the new erratum name and update the description.
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
index ef5fbe9..c27b2c4 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
@@ -31,6 +31,14 @@ to deliver its interrupts via SPIs.
This also affects writes to the tval register, due to the implicit
counter read.
+- hisilicon,erratum-161601 : A boolean property. Indicates the presence of
+ erratum 161601, which says that reading the counter is unreliable unless
+ reading twice on the register and the value of the second read is larger
+ than the first by less than 32. If the verification is unsuccessful, then
+ discard the value of this read and repeat this procedure until the verification
+ is successful. This also affects writes to the tval register, due to the
+ implicit counter read.
+
** Optional properties:
- arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured : Firmware does not initialize
_______________________________________________
linuxarm mailing list
linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx
http://rnd-openeuler.huawei.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxarm
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
