Sorry for being rather late on getting these out. Attendees: Rob Herring Mark Rutland Pavel Moll Jason Cooper Tomasz Figa David Woodhouse Should the ABI and policy documents be separate? Jason: happy to have it split up or in a single document. ePAPR: No Stuart no conversation Devicetree.org: Should approach Linux Foundation for taking responsibility of devicetree.org. ACTION on Grant to follow up with LF Best Practices document: ACTION on MARK to produce first version next week. Self Test: Waiting on overlays Schema validation Tomasz: Looking at extending DTC to support schema language. Working on validation part. Expect some RFC in near future (before the end of the year) New Business ---------------------------- David: Update on ACPI work. Grant: Do we want to do exactly the same thing in ACPI that we do in DT? David: Of the opinion that OS should be in control, if we have to do it in DT, why wouldn't we do it in ACPI? Grant: We should push for DT and ACPI bindings to be identical David: it is going to be hard to depend on firmware to setup the hardware David: Settled on following vocabulary: Translation is bad. Transliteration is more what we want. The drivers shouldn't have to know what it is actually backed onto in the common case David: Big issue is the plethora of different data types. The bios authors will always get it wrong. ACPI doesn't have a schema validator either. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
