Re: [PATCH 1/4] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Don't assume clock runs in suspend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:44:21AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> From: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The ARM specifies that the system counter "must be implemented in an
> always-on power domain," and so we try to use the counter as a source of
> timekeeping across suspend/resume. Unfortunately, some SoCs (e.g.,
> Rockchip's RK3399) do not keep the counter ticking properly when
> switched from their high-power clock to the lower-power clock used in
> system suspend. Support this quirk by adding a new device tree property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt | 5 +++++

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c                 | 9 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux