On 08/11/2016 23:16, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 12:03 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:47:07AM +0800, zhichang.yuan wrote:
For arm64, there is no I/O space as other architectural platforms, such as
X86. Most I/O accesses are achieved based on MMIO. But for some arm64 SoCs,
such as Hip06, when accessing some legacy ISA devices connected to LPC, those
known port addresses are used to control the corresponding target devices, for
example, 0x2f8 is for UART, 0xe4 is for ipmi-bt. It is different from the
normal MMIO mode in using.
This has nothing to do with arm64. Hardware with this kind of indirect
bus access could be integrated with a variety of CPU architectures. It
simply hasn't been, yet.
On some ppc's we also use similar indirect access methods for IOs. We
have a generic infrastructure for re-routing some memory or IO regions
to hooks.
On POWER8, our PCIe doesn't do IO at all, but we have an LPC bus behind
firmware calls ;-) We use that infrastructure to plumb in the LPC bus.
Hi,
I would like to mention another topic on supporting LPC, and this is
regard to eSPI support.
eSPI is seen as the successor for LPC, and some BMCs already support it.
I had a chat with Arnd on this, and the idea to model LPC as a SPI bus
adpater (and also eSPI).
However it seems to me that most platforms will/should support eSPI as a
transparent bridge, same as LPC on x86. So I don't think that this is
much point in modelling LPC/eSPI as a bus.
So we shall continue with indriect-IO support...
Thanks,
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
