On 11/18/2016 04:59 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.11.2016, 20:44 -0600 schrieb Robert Nelson:
From: Gowtham Tammana <g-tammana@xxxxxx>
BB2D entry is added to the dts file. Crossbar index number is used
for interrupt mapping.
Signed-off-by: Gowtham Tammana <g-tammana@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
index addb753..43488b6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
@@ -959,6 +959,16 @@
ti,hwmods = "dmm";
};
+ bb2d: bb2d@59000000 {
+ compatible = "ti,dra7-bb2d";
+ reg = <0x59000000 0x0700>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 120 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ ti,hwmods = "bb2d";
+ clocks = <&dpll_core_h24x2_ck>;
+ clock-names = "fclk";
"fclk" is not an accepted clock name for the etnaviv driver. It supports
up to 3 clocks: "bus", "core" and "shader". If there is only one clock
required in your design it would probably be the "core" clock.
fclk is used as a standard for all hwmod (SoC level control library
that existed prior to ARM DT-fication, and now slowly being converted
to DT). I think the core and bus clock is the same here.. I wonder if
something duplicated like the following will fly?
clocks = <&dpll_core_h24x2_ck>, <&dpll_core_h24x2_ck> ;
clock-names = "fclk", "core";
It might have been better if hwmod clocks were'nt assumed from
clock-names.. instead it could have been something like:
ti,hwmod-fck-clk-names = "core";
ti,hwmod-ick-clk-names = "bus";
ti,hwmod-ock-clk-names = "shader";
clocks = <&dpll_core_h24x2_ck>, <&clk2>, <&clk3>;
clock-names = "core", "bus", "shader";
Tero: ?
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
