Hello,
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:01:32 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> >> + soc@f00100000000 {
> >
> > Where is this value coming from? Why does the soc node needs to have a
>
> It cames from the dts files.
Where?
> > unit address? It doesn't have a 'reg' property if I remember
> > correctly.
>
> But it has a range property.
And? There are multiple ranges, and you randomly took the first one for
the unit address of the soc node?
You realize that the ranges property is a list of ranges, and they
could be in any order? Why would you pick the base address of one of
the ranges rather than any of the others?
I believe there is simply no unit address for the soc {} node. There is
definitely one for the internal-regs {} node, but not for the soc {}
node.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
