Hi Andy,
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 17:10 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Overall, since we are going to expose some properties to the Device
> Tree
> I would really think twice about naming. Better if we reuse something
> existing already.
>
> So, what I can see is
>
> dmacap,private
> dmacap,memcpy
>
> Here is a selling point as well, i.e. standardization.
>
As I can see these property name used only in "mv_xor" driver. And
they are marked as deprecated.
So, I'm not sure if I should used these names.
I agree with other comments.
--
Paltsev Eugeniy
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
