Hi Venkat, [auto build test ERROR on ulf.hansson-mmc/next] [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc5] [cannot apply to next-20161114] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ritesh-Harjani/mmc-sdhci-msm-Add-clk-rates-DDR-HS400-support/20161114-142815 base: https://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc next config: arm-defconfig (attached as .config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 reproduce: wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # save the attached .config to linux build tree make.cross ARCH=arm Note: the linux-review/Ritesh-Harjani/mmc-sdhci-msm-Add-clk-rates-DDR-HS400-support/20161114-142815 HEAD baef00575b049e246cebd910c417f34cada20ee0 builds fine. It only hurts bisectibility. All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c: In function 'sdhci_msm_execute_tuning': >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c:498:3: error: 'msm_host' undeclared (first use in this function) msm_host->tuning_done = true; ^~~~~~~~ drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c:498:3: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in vim +/msm_host +498 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c 492 dev_dbg(mmc_dev(mmc), "%s: No tuning point found\n", 493 mmc_hostname(mmc)); 494 rc = -EIO; 495 } 496 497 if (!rc) > 498 msm_host->tuning_done = true; 499 return rc; 500 } 501 --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Attachment:
.config.gz
Description: application/gzip
