Hi Caesar, On 2016/11/9 21:21, Caesar Wang wrote:
From: zhangqing <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 1.add pd node for RK3399 Soc 2.create power domain tree 3.add qos node for domain 4.add the pd_sd consumers node
I'm no sure if it is worth spliting out a seperated patch as it looks to me that you was doing 4 things within one patch, but anyway Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes in v2: - v1 on https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9322553/ - Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/386483 - Verified on ChromeOS kernel4.4 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi index b401176..e5b5b3d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ <&cru SCLK_SDMMC_DRV>, <&cru SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE>; clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "ciu-drive", "ciu-sample"; fifo-depth = <0x100>; + power-domains = <&power RK3399_PD_SD>; status = "disabled"; }; @@ -691,6 +692,11 @@ status = "disabled"; }; + qos_sd: qos@ffa74000 { + compatible = "syscon"; + reg = <0x0 0xffa74000 0x0 0x20>; + }; + qos_emmc: qos@ffa58000 { compatible = "syscon"; reg = <0x0 0xffa58000 0x0 0x20>; @@ -839,6 +845,12 @@ clocks = <&cru ACLK_GMAC>; pm_qos = <&qos_gmac>; }; + pd_sd@RK3399_PD_SD { + reg = <RK3399_PD_SD>; + clocks = <&cru HCLK_SDMMC>, + <&cru SCLK_SDMMC>; + pm_qos = <&qos_sd>; + }; pd_vio@RK3399_PD_VIO { reg = <RK3399_PD_VIO>; #address-cells = <1>;
-- Best Regards Shawn Lin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
