On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 03:47:07PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:19:36AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > This compliments the existing scheme that lets it be set via > > platform_data. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I would prefer https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg148819.html > which appears to address the same problem and is less cryptic. Is there a patch someplace that implements that proposed DT binding? I couldn't find anything. > NACK unless someone convinces me otherwise. *shrug* both styles of definition seem to be used in various device tree bindings. The downside with Mahoda's proposal is that it only covers 3 of the 8 configuration bits, and will require alot of code for parsing. It seems really clunky, and why is a regulator involved to set the A/D sensitivity? Weird. But I only need has-temp3, so if a patch appears please cc me and I'll review it here.. Regards, Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
