Hi,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:05:17PM +0800, Chris Ruehl wrote:
> @@ -231,27 +249,40 @@ static int usb_phy_gen_xceiv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> nop->reset_active_low = true; /* default behaviour */
> + nop->cs_active_low = true;
>
> if (dev->of_node) {
> struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> enum of_gpio_flags flags;
> + enum of_gpio_flags csflags;
>
> if (of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &clk_rate))
> clk_rate = 0;
>
> needs_vcc = of_property_read_bool(node, "vcc-supply");
> +
> nop->gpio_reset = of_get_named_gpio_flags(node, "reset-gpios",
> 0, &flags);
> +
two unrelated changes
> if (nop->gpio_reset == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> nop->reset_active_low = flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
>
> + nop->gpio_chipselect = of_get_named_gpio_flags(node, "cs-gpios",
> + 0, &csflags);
> + if (gpio_is_valid(nop->gpio_chipselect))
> + nop->cs_active_low = csflags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
> +
> } else if (pdata) {
> type = pdata->type;
> clk_rate = pdata->clk_rate;
> needs_vcc = pdata->needs_vcc;
> nop->gpio_reset = pdata->gpio_reset;
> + nop->gpio_chipselect = pdata->gpio_chipselect;
> + } else {
> + nop->gpio_reset = -1;
This line is already going upstream, please remove it, i'll handle the
conflict later.
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
